Underpayment Identification & Recovery
The revenue you already earned but were never fully paid.
Get your free RCM assessment →The problem
Underpayments hide in plain sight. Without contract-level review, partial payments look like closed accounts — and the variance is quietly written off.
HDT reviews payments against expected contractual rates, identifies variances, and pursues recovery of the difference you are owed.
What HDT does
Variance by payer and contract, and recovered underpayment totals.
Signs you have a problem here
What we track for you
Why Underpayment Identification & Recovery matters to your revenue
The quietest revenue leak in healthcare is the payment that posts without question. If contract terms are not loaded where they can be checked, every remit is taken on faith — and payers’ systems make mistakes that are, statistically, rarely in your favor. Studies consistently find 1–3% of net revenue lost to unverified underpayments.
HDT loads and maintains your contracted rates, checks actual payments against expected allowables systematically, pursues variances with payers through documented follow-up, and reports recovered dollars quarterly. When a payer shows systematic variance, you get the evidence — by code, by volume, by dollar — to take into your next negotiation.
Working with your team
We need your payer contracts once, then maintain the rate tables ourselves. Recovered variance shows up in your deposits; systematic-variance evidence goes to whoever leads your payer negotiations.
Underpayment Identification & Recovery — frequently asked questions
How common are payer underpayments?
Persistent studies estimate 1–3% of net revenue is lost to underpayments in practices that do not verify against contract. It compounds silently, remit by remit.
What is needed to detect underpayments?
Loaded contract terms, payment-level variance checking, and someone accountable for pursuing discrepancies. Missing any one of the three means underpayments post as normal.
Can historical underpayments be recovered?
Often, within payer-specific lookback windows — commonly 12–24 months. A retrospective variance review is a standard early HDT project.
What if a payer pays 100% of the billed charge?
That usually means your charge is below the contracted allowable — you are underpricing. It is one of the exception patterns we audit for.
Related service areas
Insurance Payment Posting
Explore Insurance Payment Posting →Accounts Receivable Management
Explore Accounts Receivable Management →Denial Analysis & Appeals
Explore Denial Analysis & Appeals →Specialties where this matters most
Ready for a revenue cycle you can actually see?
Get your free RCM assessment — clear, prioritized findings on where revenue is aging, which denials recur, and what structured execution would change.
Get your free RCM assessment →